ArticleVeterinary world2025
Prevalence and characterization of gastrointestinal and ectoparasites in long-tailed macaques (
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Human Primates as Sentinels and Reservoirs of Emerging Zoonotic Diseases in Indonesia: A One Health Perspective on Pathogen Spillover, Surveillance Gaps, and Regulatory Frameworks.Journal of medical primatology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminths in Long-Tailed Macaques (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Long-tailed macaques ( Materials and Methods: A total of 100 fecal samples were collected from wild macaques at four sites: Pulau Weh Sabang Nature Tourism Park, Kuala Langsa Mangrove Forest, Saree (Aceh Besar), and Aceh Jaya. The parasitological examination involved the centrifugation method, lactophenol staining, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Parasites were identified based on egg morphology and adult worm anatomy. Results: Of the 100 samples analyzed, 45% tested positive for GI parasites. Nematode prevalence was highest (80%), followed by protozoa (10%) and ectoparasites (10%). Identified nematodes included Conclusion: The high prevalence of nematodes, particularly zoonotic species, underscores the importance of monitoring parasitic infections in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.