ReviewBrain & spine2025
Management of hydrocephalus associated with large vestibular schwannomas.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Some patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) may present with hydrocephalus. Research question: In such cases, some authors suggest cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting, while others prefer tumor removal from the outset. Material and methods: In our study, we retrospectively compared patients for whom we chose to treat the hydrocephalus with CSF shunting and those for whom VS surgery was performed first. Results: Among a group of n consecutive patients harboring a stage 3 and 4 VS and eligible for resection, 34 patients presented with hydrocephalus. Thirteen patients underwent CSF shunting (group 1). Twenty-one patients had their VS removed first (group 2). Among the latter group, 18 patients had resolution of hydrocephalus. There was a significant difference between group 1 and 2 in the presence of signs of intracranial hypertension (p = 0.00), preoperative tumor volume (p = 0.04).Previous radiosurgery and a strong adherence of the tumor capsule to the brain were statistically associated with requirement of CSF shunting (p = 0.01). Discussion and conclusion: The results of this study suggest that VS patients presenting with a well-tolerated hydrocephalus should be preferentially treated of their schwannoma with rare need for a shunt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.