ArticleBrain & spine2025
Management of chronic subdural hematoma in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous Epidural Infusion of Hydroxyethyl Starch for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Retrospective Case Series.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Intracranial Hypotension Following Spinal Manipulation: A Case Report and Scoping Review of the Literature.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Pressure-controlled fibrinolytic irrigation for membranous and recurrent chronic subdural hematomas.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Bilateral subdural hematomas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: A systematic review with case illustration.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Pathophysiology of chronic subdural hematoma-new insights.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Acute subdural hematoma in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: illustrative case and review of the literature.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for subdural hematoma in spontaneous intracranial hypotension are male sex, longer disease duration, and repeated epidural blood patches.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is no accepted algorithm for the management of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) caused by spinal CSF leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Research question: This study analyses characteristics of cSDH in SIH to establish a practicable management algorithm. Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with spinal CSF leak closure from April 2018 to April 2024. Demographics, leak type, treatment modalities, as well as cSDH characteristics, prevalence, and risk factors were analyzed. Results: Among 272 SIH patients, 85 (31 %) concomitantly had cSDH, predominantly bilateral (88 %). Hematoma width ranged from 2 to 30 mm. cSDH prevalence was highest in CSF-venous fistulas (43 %), followed by ventral (31 %) and lateral leaks (22 %). Male sex (OR = 4; p < 0.001) and age >70 years (OR = 6; p = 0.008) were significant risk factors. Surgical evacuation was performed in 23 patients, with symptoms attributable to cSDH in 17/23 patients. The biggest cSDH without surgical treatment was 20 mm. No neurological deterioration occurred during diagnostics or treatment of CSF leaks. After leak closure, no cSDH, regardless of initial size or previous treatment, required additional treatment, and no recurrence occurred in the 3-month follow-up. Discussion and conclusion: Primary localization and targeted treatment of the spinal leak is safe in asymptomatic patients and cSDH ≤10 mm ("leak first" strategy). Immediate evacuation of the cSDH is mandatory in symptomatic patients ("subdural first" strategy). We consider the CSF leak closure as a causal treatment for cSDH resulting in a markedly low, close to zero, recurrence rate. Prospective validation of these findings is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.