Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689136›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2025

Review of treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular posterior cerebral artery aneurysms.

Andreas Theofanopoulos, Rajiv Kumar Khajuria, Dilaware Khan, Lucas Troude, Ben Waldau, Katharina Faust, Sajjad Muhammad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas TheofanopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Rajiv Kumar KhajuriaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dilaware KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lucas TroudeDepartment of Neurosurgery, North University Hospital Marseille, APHM-AMU, Marseille, France.
Ben WaldauDepartment of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Katharina FaustDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sajjad MuhammadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Giant saccular posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges, mainly due to the challenging approach required for aneurysm obliteration. Research question: To review treatment modalities and outcomes of patients harboring giant (>2.5 cm) PCA saccular aneurysms distal to the basilar bifurcation. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review through PubMed and Scopus to identify cases of giant saccular PCA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or endovascularly. Patients' demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes and follow-up information were retrieved. Results: Data from 33 studies including 55 patients were obtained. Mean patient age was 34.35 years. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 38.48 mm. Presentation was aneurysm rupture in 30.9 %, headache in 23.6 %, hemiparesis or tetraparesis in 12.7 %, hemianopsia in 10.9 % and hydrocephalus in 5.5 %. At least 30.9 % had significant brainstem compression. Treatment was endovascular in 23.6 %, microsurgical in 67.3 % and combined in 9.1 %. Debulking to reduce mass effect was required in 32.4 %. Preoperative mRS ranged from 1 to 5. A favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was reported on 92.7 % of cases. Death rate was 3.6 %. The PCA was sacrificed in 40 % of the patients without severe neurologic morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 11 years. Discussion and conclusion: Giant PCA aneurysms are amenable to both treatment modalities. PCA sacrifice may be required and is often well tolerated, presumably due to the rich collateral supply. Mass effect may necessitate debulking. PCA bypass may be required, but carries significant morbidity.

Indexed as

Endovascular treatmentGiant PCA aneurysmOutcomeSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID40689136
PMCPMC12272901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.