Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689105›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2024

Deep Neuromuscular Block with Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mohammed Said ElSharkawy, Reda Khalil Abdelrahman, Abdallah Elabd Hassan, Mohammed Gaber Ibrahim Saad, Ismail Ahmed Elzoughari, Abdelkarem Hussini Ismail Alsayed, Asmaa Abdelbadie, Rehab Abd El Fattah Helal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2473-7381
Mohammed Said ElSharkawyDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-6728
Reda Khalil AbdelrahmanIntensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7137-7421
Abdallah Elabd HassanIntensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4083-3407
Mohammed Gaber Ibrahim SaadIntensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4244-9377
Ismail Ahmed ElzoughariIntensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdelkarem Hussini Ismail AlsayedIntensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Asmaa AbdelbadieClinical Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University, Beni-suef, Egypt.
Rehab Abd El Fattah HelalDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain management remains a challenge in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Objectives: The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in conjunction with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum )PP) on postoperative pain, surgical parameters, and recovery outcomes. Methods: This randomized controlled double-blind study included 44 participants undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized equally into two groups (22 each): Group D received deep NMB, while group M received moderate NMB using cis-atracurium, through the utilization of computer-generated random numbers enclosed within sealed, opaque envelopes, following a parallel approach. Regarding deep NMB, following an initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, a continuous infusion of 0.06 - 0.12 mg/kg/hr was administered to maintain a post-tetanic count between 1 and 2, with low PP pressure of 10 - 12 mmHg. Conversely, for moderate NMB, after the same initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, the continuous infusion commenced upon the train-of-four count returning to 2, with the rate adjusted to sustain a count between 1 and 3, and standard PP pressure of 15 mmHg. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity measured by NRS scores from 2 hours to 48 hours post-surgery, time to first analgesic administration, cumulative opioid consumption within the initial 48-hour postoperative period, and patient-reported satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Statistical analysis using SPSS v26 included tests for normality (Shapiro-Wilks), with parametric data analyzed by Results: Group D experienced a considerably longer time until the first analgesic rescue compared to group M (9.82 ± 1.5 hours vs. 7.23 ± 1.19 hours, P < 0.001). Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours was lower in Group D (10.77 ± 1.51 mg vs. 13.09 ± 1.74 mg, P < 0.001). At 6, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively, group D exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P < 0.05). Surgical duration, surgical field quality, complication rates, and patient satisfaction were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Deep NMB combined with low-pressure PP provided superior postoperative analgesia without compromising surgical field quality or increasing complications in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Indexed as

LaparoscopicLow PressureNeuromuscular BlockPneumoperitoneumPostoperative Pain

Identifiers

PMID40689105
PMCPMC12275633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.