Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688959›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Systems in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.

Shyamsunder Kakatum Rao, Prashant Gupta, Asadullah Mohammed, Kanwarjit Zakhmi, Manas Ranjan Mohanty, Priji Prasad Jalaja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shyamsunder Kakatum RaoSoftware Engineering, RouteOne LLC, Canton, USA.
Prashant GuptaDepartment of Technology, Intuit, Plano, USA.
Asadullah MohammedTechnical Program Manager, Kforce Inc., Houston, Texas, USA.
Kanwarjit ZakhmiTechnical Operations Manager, AWS, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Manas Ranjan MohantyAmazon Core Search Team, Amazon Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Sunnyvale, USA.
Priji Prasad JalajaDepartment of Surgery, Emory University Atlanta, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare systems has emerged as a transformative approach to addressing rising costs and inefficiencies. While AI applications show promise in improving financial outcomes, the evidence remains fragmented due to methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting. This systematic review aims to synthesize economic evaluations of AI in healthcare, assessing its impact on cost savings, efficiency gains, and cost-effectiveness while identifying gaps in the current literature. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and EconLit), identifying 341 records. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, six studies met the inclusion criteria, which focused on AI-driven economic evaluations in healthcare settings. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and methodological quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool. A narrative synthesis was performed due to the heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. The included studies demonstrated significant cost savings, such as reducing unnecessary diagnostic tests by 45,247 in 45 days and lowering Medicaid expenditures by up to United States Dollar (USD) 12.9 million annually. AI also improved cost-effectiveness, though some trade-offs in clinical outcomes were noted. However, methodological limitations were prevalent, including unclear perspectives, a lack of sensitivity analyses, and insufficient discussion of ethical implications. Risk of bias assessment revealed that only three of the six studies had low bias, while others exhibited moderate bias due to these limitations. AI holds substantial potential to enhance financial sustainability in healthcare, but the evidence base is limited by methodological inconsistencies and a lack of long-term evaluations. Standardized frameworks for economic assessments of AI are urgently needed to ensure reliable, equitable, and scalable implementations. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies, stakeholder engagement, and transparent reporting to bridge the gap between AI innovation and healthcare system priorities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecost-effectivenessfinancial impacthealthcare economicsmachine learningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40688959
PMCPMC12273524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.