ArticleCureus2025
Effects of a Stingless Bee Honey Mouth Rinse on Dental Plaque Accumulation: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Mouth rinses are recommended as an adjunct to mechanical methods in oral hygiene procedures for the prevention and management of periodontal diseases. The currently used mouth rinses impose several side effects on patients, which include a burning sensation and altered taste. Alternatively, stingless bee honey (SBH) is a natural food with many health benefits, making it suitable as an active mouth rinse ingredient. Several characteristics, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and healing properties, make it a potential therapeutic agent in periodontal therapy as well as in the oral cavity. This study aimed to investigate the ability of SBH mouth rinses to reduce plaque accumulation and to assess patient acceptance of their use. Methods This is a randomised pilot clinical trial performed on volunteers (N = 30) with healthy gingiva and/or mild gingivitis, who were randomly prescribed SBH, chlorhexidine (CHX), or normal saline (NS) mouth rinses, without oral hygiene practices for three days. Plaque scores were recorded prior to the experiment by a single examiner, blinded to the treatment allocation. Plaque accumulation and patient perception were recorded post-intervention using the plaque score and visual analogue scale (VAS), respectively. Results At three days post-intervention, there was no significant difference in the plaque score of the SBH and NS groups (p > 0.05), compared to the baseline value. A significant decrease in the plaque score was found in the CHX group (p < 0.05), compared to the baseline. A significantly better taste and lower burning sensation were reported in the SBH group than in the NS and CHX groups, respectively. Conclusions The SBH mouth rinse did not promote plaque accumulation in the absence of oral hygiene and caused less burning sensation. CHX, however, has a greater ability to prevent plaque accumulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.