Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688891›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Acetabular Reconstruction in a Case of Chondrosarcoma.

Daniel I Ríos Moreno, Francisco Mahaluf Recasens, Luis Bahamonde

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel I Ríos MorenoMedicine, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción, CHL.
Francisco Mahaluf RecasensHip Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Víctor Ríos Ruiz, Los Ángeles, CHL.
Luis BahamondeOrthopedics, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, CHL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrosarcomas of the pelvis represent a challenge in clinical management because surgical resection is the only effective therapeutic option, given the resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy of malignant chondroid tumors. Reconstruction after resection involves critical structures, such as the acetabulum or hip joint, and is a demanding surgical procedure with high morbidity. Complications are frequent due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, which on the one hand makes it difficult to obtain adequate surgical margins, and on the other hand, the various implants designed for reconstruction have shown a high rate of mechanical and infectious complications. In this report, we present an innovative technique for pelvic reconstruction after resection of the acetabular region (Enneking type II resection), whose planning included the use of a three-dimensional printed model (3D printing) of the patient's pelvis. We describe a case of a 39-year-old patient with a grade 2 central chondrosarcoma. Surgical treatment included 3D model planning, followed by tumor resection and reconstruction of the acetabulum using conventional implants. The main mechanical support of the technique in this case was achieved using threaded Schanz wires as osteosynthetic fixation of the anterior and posterior columns, on which an acetabular basket was cemented. Although at six months, a fracture of the remaining iliac bone and slight elevation of the hemipelvis occurred, this did not mean pain or impairment of the ability to walk with a cane. This particular cost-effective technique allowed the functional reconstruction of the hip, at least in the medium term, so it can be considered as an alternative in resections in zone II of the pelvis. In comparison to customized 3D-printed implants, this approach represents a more cost-effective option, particularly in settings with limited resources. While personalized implants offer superior anatomic fit, they require specialized manufacturing and high costs, often limiting their accessibility. In contrast, this technique utilizes standard implants with planning aided by 3D models, allowing surgeons to tailor reconstructions without reliance on custom hardware. Given these advantages, the method may be adaptable to a broader range of complex pelvic resections where institutional resources are constrained.

Indexed as

3d printing in surgeryacetabular reconstructioncase reportcustom implantship prosthesisinternal hemipelvectomyorthopedic oncologypelvic chondrosarcomaskeletal reconstructionsurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID40688891
PMCPMC12276759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.