Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688867›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case Report on Pericardial Effusion Associated With Selpercatinib in the First Patient With Rearranged During Transfection (RET) Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer.

Tomoko Shiraishi, Yu Isoshima, Masahiro Tahara, Takanobu Jotatsu, Kazuhiro Yatera

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomoko ShiraishiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, JPN.
Yu IsoshimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, JPN.
Masahiro TaharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, JPN.
Takanobu JotatsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, JPN.
Kazuhiro YateraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selpercatinib was approved in 2021 for the treatment of rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive lung cancer. The most frequent adverse events associated with selpercatinib are hepatic dysfunction, hypersensitivity, hypertension, QT interval prolongation, and peripheral edema. However, pericardial effusion has not been reported as an adverse event in the package insert or background clinical studies. A 70-year-old woman with RET fusion gene-positive lung cancer cT2bN2M1c (OSS, BRA) stage IVB developed pericardial effusion about 18 months after starting selpercatinib treatment. The patient wished to continue selpercatinib treatment, so the dose was gradually and carefully reduced to 40 mg/day. This dose reduction resulted in a decrease in pericardial effusion while maintaining tumor regression. RET fusion-positive lung cancer is rare, accounting for only 1%-2% of all lung cancers. Since selpercatinib was approved relatively recently in 2021, the long-term adverse effects of its administration remain unclear. Long-term treatment with selpercatinib may potentially be associated with fluid accumulation, including pericardial effusion, although further studies are needed to clarify this relationship.

Indexed as

adverse eventpericardial effusionrearranged during transfection (ret) fusion-positive lung cancerret kinase inhibitorselpercatinib

Identifiers

PMID40688867
PMCPMC12273527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.