ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence and Specificity of Red Blood Cell Alloantibodies in Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Meghalaya, India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Prevalence and Specificity of Red Blood Cell Antibodies in Blood Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Blood bank trends in Kuwait: five-year analysis of donations and investigations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization complicates transfusion therapy by making compatible units scarce and increasing the likelihood of hemolytic transfusion reactions, particularly in multi-transfused or sensitized patients. Data from northeastern India remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence and specificity of RBC alloantibodies and their clinical associations at a tertiary care center in Meghalaya. Methods We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional review in the Department of Transfusion Medicine and Blood Centre, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong. From March 2021 to February 2024, we screened every patient with an RBC transfusion request using an antibody screening cell panel and, when necessary, performed antibody identification. We retrieved clinical and transfusion histories from laboratory records and used chi-square tests to examine associations with alloantibody formation. Results Although the overall frequency of alloantibody development was low, certain patterns emerged, most notably higher prevalence in women and transfusion-dependent patients. Women and patients with prior transfusions developed alloantibodies more often than their counterparts. Anti-E, the most common antibody, dominated the Rhesus system findings, and antibodies in the Kidd system were also frequent. Antenatal patients formed the largest subgroup with alloantibodies. Conclusions Routine antibody screening and precise identification should remain central to pre-transfusion testing, particularly for transfusion-dependent individuals and pregnant patients. Our region-specific data support targeted antigen-matching strategies and reinforce the need for robust transfusion policies to enhance patient safety and optimize blood-product use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.