ArticleCureus2025
Successful Treatment of BRAF V600E-Mutant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BRAF mutations, particularly BRAF V600E, are rare but clinically significant molecular alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), often linked to aggressive disease and poor prognosis. While targeted therapies have shown efficacy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, their role in IHCC remains uncertain. This report describes the case of a 59-year-old woman with advanced BRAF V600E-mutated IHCC (cT3N3M1c, stage IVc) treated with encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab. The BRAF V600E mutation was identified through next-generation sequencing. Initially, the patient was given gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as first-line chemotherapy; however, her metastatic lesions progressed rapidly within one month. Due to the lack of response, second-line treatment with encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was started, resulting in a favorable initial response. Unfortunately, the disease progressed five months after initiating this regimen. This case highlights the potential benefit of combined BRAF/MEK/EGFR inhibition in BRAF V600E-mutated IHCC and underscores the need for further research to optimize treatment strategies for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.