ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2025
Survival and Associated Risk Factors in Mechanically Ventilated Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, Management, and Alarmingly High Mortality of Burn Patients: A Retrospective Analysis From a Resource-Limited Tertiary Centre in Syria.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the survival rate and identify associated risk factors in mechanically ventilated (MV) burn patients. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Velayat Hospital, a burn and plastic surgery referral center affiliated with Guilan University of Medical Sciences, between March 2011, and September 2020. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records and analyzed using SPSS software (version 24.0). Patients discharged alive or lost to follow-up were treated as censored observations in a time-to-event analysis. Results: The mean age of survivors was 19.03±30.21 years, compared to 42.54±19.30 years in the non-survivors. Men comprised 78.9% (n=30) of survivors and 64.9% (n=155) of non-survivors. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) survival time was 18.33±1.36 days (median=12±1.24 days). There were significant differences between survivor and non-survivor groups in terms of age, length of stay, presence of comorbidities, inhalation injury, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) ( Conclusion: Age, length of stay, renal failure, ARDS, and sepsis were associated with increased mortality risk in MV burn patients. While these findings highlighted critical prognostic factors, causal inferences require further investigation through longitudinal or interventional studies to guide targeted therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.