ArticleBone reports2025
VEGF-A, -C, -D, VEGFR1, -2, -3, PDGF-BB and FGF-2 join forces to induce vascular and lymphatic angiogenesis during bone healing of hip implants.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bone Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Form a Distinct Skeletal Population and Drive Skeletal Repair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bone‑origin repair in diabetic foot ulcers: Mechanisms of callus formation and endocrine effects in healing (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Blood and lymphatic vascular network in bone injury repair: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- From complexity to clarity: aging bone marrow niche in bone and blood regeneration and malignancy.Bone research · 2026Review
- An injectable APAG/CGF biomaterial orchestrates gingival black triangle reconstruction via biomimetic microenvironment for cellular regulation.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Infrapatellar Fat Pad in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Progress in targeting tumor-associated macrophages in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Bone grafts and synthetic substitutes in dental applications: a comprehensive review of molecular mechanisms, materials evolution, and clinical perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Angiogenic growth factors are a critical part of bone repair and regeneration in the aftermath of bone trauma. In the current study we monitored the spatiotemporal responses of angiogenic factors and receptors during the process of osseointegration of hip implants. Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients having undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to one-sided osteoarthritis (OA) were monitored during a period of 18 years (Y) by repeated measurements of plasma biomarkers as well as clinical and radiographic variables, the latter two showing all implants of the study to be well anchored throughout the follow-up. Eighty-one healthy donors divided into three gender- and age-matched subgroups and twenty OA patients awaiting THA, served as controls. Plasma was analyzed for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) or sFlt-1, VEGFR2 (KDR/sFlk-1), VEGFR3 (sFlt-4), platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and placental growth factor (PIGF). Analysis of biomarkers was done by means of a high-sensitivity and wide dynamic range electrochemiluminescence technique allowing for detection of low levels and minor changes in biomarker levels. Spatiotemporal changes of biomarkers in THA patients during the follow-up were presented in the context of the four phases of endochondral bone repair. Results: VEGF-A, VEGFR1, PDGF-BB and FGF-2 were significantly higher, whereas VEGF-C was significantly lower in presurgery OA patients versus healthy subjects but were all normalized shortly after implant surgery. VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGF-2 and PDGF-BB increased sharply 1-2 Y post-implant and reached a peak significantly above healthy control subjects at 5-7 Y after implant insertion before returning to control level 13-15Y post-surgery, except for VEGF-D that returned to control level at 7Y post-implant. VEGFR1 decreased to the level of healthy subjects at 6 W post-THA and remained there throughout the study. PIGF did not differ from healthy subjects at any point during the follow-up. Conclusion: Increased levels of VEGF-A, VEGFR1, PDGF-BB and FGF-2 and reduced VEGF-C in presurgery OA relative healthy subjects support a cartilage protective or disease-inducing role in osteoarthritis. The concerted increase by all proangiogenic factors of the study, except VEGFR1 and PIGF, at 5 Y post-implant lend strong support to this being the phase of bone repair when blood and lymph vessels invade the avascular calcified hypertrophic cartilage and trigger its remodeling into bone in hip arthroplasty patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.