Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688798›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2025

Assessment of pharmacovigilance knowledge and ADR reporting skills in undergraduate medical students using the OSPA model.

T Y Sree Sudha, Kusum Kumari, C Vasantha Kalyani, Monika Kankarwal, K S B S Krishna Sasanka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T Y Sree SudhaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
Kusum KumariCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
C Vasantha KalyaniCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
Monika KankarwalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
K S B S Krishna SasankaDepartment of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pharmacovigilance (PV) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting are essential components of ensuring medication safety. However, many healthcare students have limited knowledge in these areas. This study evaluates the pharmacovigilance knowledge and ADR reporting skills among undergraduate medical and nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Deoghar, with 190 undergraduate healthcare students. Participants completed a validated structured questionnaire assessing their pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting knowledge. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0, with descriptive statistics to present the results. Results: The findings revealed that 35 % of students had limited knowledge of pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting, while 52 % demonstrated a moderate level of understanding. A majority were aware of the importance of pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting, although they faced challenges in completing ADR reports accurately. Conclusions: Although students exhibited a basic understanding of pharmacovigilance, significant gaps were found in their ability to effectively report ADRs. These findings underscore the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance education within healthcare curricula, ensuring students are adequately prepared to apply their knowledge in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Adverse drug reactionsHealthcare studentsKnowledgePharmacovigilanceReporting skills

Identifiers

PMID40688798
PMCPMC12273474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.