ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo analyze the pathogenicity and clinical features of patients in a consanguineous cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) family due to heterozygous variants in the
methodsWhole exome sequencing was used to screen for pathogenic genes and candidate pathogenic variants were obtained by bioinformatics analysis. Sanger sequencing was used for validation and familial co-segregation analysis to determine pathogenic variants. Pymol software was applied to produce a 3D structure image of the protein to analyze the structural and functional alterations of the protein. The pathogenicity of genetic variants was evaluated according to ACMG guidelines.
resultsThe chief clinical symptoms of this proband included obvious visual impairment, protanopia and deuteranopia, peripheral punctate pigment, arteriolar attenuation, structural and functional abnormalities revealed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electroretinography (ERG) including thinning of the outer retinal layer, a discontinuous external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ), granular hyperreflective projections between the retinal pigment epithelium and the interdigitation zone, severe attenuation of photopic responses with mild reduced scotopic responses. Whole-exome sequencing revealed that the proband carried a heterozygous variant of the
conclusionThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.