Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688735›Full record

ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Early postoperative changes in corneal densitometry after SMILE with 120-μm and 130-μm cap thickness: a comparative study.

Shirou Wu, Hongying Jin, Ting Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shirou WuEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hongying JinEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ting WanEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare early postoperative changes in corneal densitometry after small incision lenticule extraction using 120-μm and 130-μm cap thicknesses. Methods: 69 eyes of 39 patients who underwent small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with cap thicknesses of 120-μm (n ​= ​34) and 130-μm (n ​= ​35) were included in this study. The corneal densitometry (CD) of three zones (0-2 ​mm, 2-6 ​mm, and 6-10 ​mm) of the anterior, central, and posterior corneal layers was evaluated before, one week, and one month after surgery. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical degree, cylinder degree, and spherical equivalent (SE) were also analyzed and compared between the two groups before and after surgery. Results: Little difference was detected between the two groups in postoperative UCVA, BCVA, SE, and cylinder degree at one month. No statistically significant differences were found between the preoperative and postoperative CD values for the overall (0-12 ​mm) cornea and the 6-10 ​mm zone in either group. A significant increase in CD was observed in the 0-2 ​mm and 2-6 ​mm zones of the anterior layer in the 120-μm group, and the 0-2 ​mm zone of the central layer in the 130-μm group, one week postoperatively. These changes persisted for one month after surgery ( Conclusions: CD increased mainly in the 0-6 ​mm zone of the anterior layer in the early phase after the SMILE procedure with both the 120-μm and 130-μm groups. The increase in CD in the anterior 2-6 ​mm zone one week postoperatively was higher in the 120-μm group than in the 130-μm group. SMILE with 120-μm and 130-μm cap thickness were both efficient and safe, but eyes with a 120-μm cap thickness showed higher postoperative corneal wavefront aberrations.

Indexed as

Cap thicknessCorneal densitometrySMILEWavefront aberration

Identifiers

PMID40688735
PMCPMC12274913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.