ArticleDiscover psychology2025
Protocol for a scoping review of PTSD and minority stress interventions for LGBTQIA + adults.
Article in Discover psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brief transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy and expressive writing for hazardous drinking and posttraumatic stress symptoms among sexual and gender minority adults: Pilot trial protocol.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: LGBTQIA + people experience trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at higher rates than cisgender heterosexual people, in addition to experiencing minority stress. There remains a dearth of research on appropriate PTSD interventions and minority stress interventions for LGBTQIA + people. However, the scope of the literature on neither PTSD interventions nor minority stress interventions for LGBTQIA + adults has ever been reviewed. Furthermore, research on PTSD-focused and minority stress-focused interventions remains relatively siloed, despite the link between minority stress and PTSD symptoms. The proposed scoping review aims to: (1) describe the scope of the current literature, chart available data, and synthesize findings, (2) collate information on existing PTSD and minority stress interventions for LGBTQIA + adults, and (3) identify gaps in the literature and directions for future research. Methods: Research produced since 2000 on psychological, psychotherapeutic, and behavioral interventions for PTSD, minority stress, or both within the LGBTQIA + adult population will be reviewed. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Results: The search yielded a total of 6818 results. Following deduplication, a total of 4945 results remained. Title/abstract screening will be followed by full-text review and data coding, charting, and mapping. Conclusions: This scoping review will be the first to describe the state of the literature and synthesize information on both PTSD and minority stress interventions for LGBTQIA + adults. Findings may also highlight promising interventions and treatment components. Information gleaned may inform future adaptations of existing interventions and development of new interventions for LGBTQIA + adults experiencing PTSD and/or minority stress. Public significance statement: This paper discusses the planned steps for an ongoing scoping review. The scoping review will provide an overview of treatments for PTSD and for minority stress for LGBTQIA + adults. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44202-025-00355-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.