ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2025
Elevated glucose levels in melanoma patients - a real-world analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elevated fasting glucose is common in lung cancer patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT: A brief report.Metabolism open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the glycemic status of consecutive melanoma patients undergoing standardized capillary fasting blood glucose (cFBG) assessment prior to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) examination. Methods: This retrospective study included 336 consecutive melanoma patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. Fasting cFBG levels were measured prior to FDG PET/CT and classified according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of cFBG levels. Sensitivity analyses were performed on patients examined before 11 AM and fasting for 8 h as well as patients without known diabetes. Results: The cohort included 336 melanoma patients with a median age of 67 years (IQR 57-76), 36 % female (122/336), and 12 % (40/336) with known diabetes mellitus. The median cFBG was 103 mg/dL (IQR 94-112; 5.7 mmol/L, IQR 5.2-6.2). Overall, 58 % (194/336) of patients had non-normal cFBG levels (≥100 mg/dL; ≥5.6 mmol/L), consistent with findings from a sensitivity analysis of patients presenting before 11 AM, where 58 % (115/198) exhibited non-normal levels. Excluding patients with known diabetes, 56 % (165/296) of patients had non-normal cFBG levels, with 7 % (20/210) having levels ≥126 mg/dL (≥7.0 mmol/L), indicative of possible undiagnosed diabetes mellitus. Multivariable linear regression analysis identified male gender, active disease, and subcutaneous fat as independent predictors of cFBG levels, whereas traditional risk factors such as BMI, visceral fat, hypertension or lack of exercise were not independent predictors. Conclusion: More than half of melanoma patients have elevated cFBG levels, even in those without known diabetes, highlighting the need for improved glycemic screening and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.