Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688631›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2025

A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications.

Isaac Hands, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isaac HandsKentucky Cancer Registry, 2365 Harrodsburg Rd, Suite A230, 40504 Lexington, KY USA.
Ramakanth KavuluruDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, 329 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40506 USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Advanced End-to-End Relation Extraction with Deep Neural NetworksR01LM013240 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013INCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical texts from pathology and radiology reports provide critical information for cancer diagnosis and staging. This study surveys the application of natural language processing (NLP) in cancer registry operations from 2014 to 2024. A total of 156 articles from Scopus and PubMed were reviewed and were categorized by NLP methods, document types, cancer sites, and research aims. NLP approaches were evenly distributed across rule-based (n=70), machine learning (n=66), and traditional deep learning (n=70), with transformer models (n=29) gaining prominence since 2019. Encoder-only models like BERT and its clinical adaptations (e.g., ClinicalBERT, RadBERT) show significant promise, though methods for increasing context length are needed. Decoder-only models (e.g., GPT-3, GPT-4) are less explored due to privacy concerns and computational demands. Notably, pediatric cancers, melanomas, and lymphomas are underrepresented, as are research areas such as disease progression, clinical trial matching, and patient communication. Multi-modal models, important for precision oncology and cancer screening, are also scarce. Our study highlights the potential of NLP to enhance data abstraction efficiency and accuracy in cancer registries, making greater use of cancer registry data for patient benefit. However, further research is needed to fully leverage transformer-based models, particularly for underrepresented cancer types and outcomes. Addressing these gaps can improve the timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of structured data collection from clinical text, ultimately enhancing cancer research and patient outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5.

Indexed as

CancerCancer registriesClinical textNatural language processingTransformers

Identifiers

PMID40688631
PMCPMC12267331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.