ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2025
Adding Tolvaptan in the Inpatient Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyponatremia: Budget Impact Analysis in Thailand.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Tolvaptan is used as an add-on therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with volume overload, particularly those with hyponatremia (HN), but its cost raises concern. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of adding 30 mg of tolvaptan to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone in hospitalized HF patients with HN in Thailand. Methods: A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was developed in accordance with Thai Health Technology Assessment guidelines from the payer's perspective. Epidemiological data on HF in Thailand were used to estimate the target population. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the EVEREST trial. Cost components included tolvaptan acquisition and HF-related hospitalization costs. Cost data were sourced from the National Health Security Office. The net budget impact (NBI) was calculated as the difference in total budget between standard care with tolvaptan and standard care alone. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impact of key variables. Results: The total budget without tolvaptan was 201 million THB (5,802,973 USD), increasing to 221 million THB (6,365,607 USD) with tolvaptan, resulting in an NBI of 19.5 million THB (562,634 USD) or 1117 THB (32 USD) per member. Despite higher drug costs, tolvaptan use reduced hospitalization costs (4.2 million USD vs 5.8 million USD) due to fewer HF hospitalization days and length of stay reduction. A lower tolvaptan dose, reduced HN risk, or a daily cost reduction of at least 25.5% could result in a negative NBI. Conclusion: Although tolvaptan reduced hospital length of stay, its use at 30 mg daily still led to a positive NBI. These findings are relevant for Thailand and similar healthcare systems considering tolvaptan adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.