ArticleDigital health
Designing and implementing healthcare technology for rehabilitation processes-a wicked problem? Lessons learned from a collaboration between healthcare personnel and technologists.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This paper presents the results of a critical ethnography study on the design and implementation of Ad Voca, a web platform for rehabilitation purposes that can be integrated with the electronic health record. The process involved technologists and healthcare personnel collaborating to harness the platform's design, amendments, and implementation strategies. Methods: The design and implementation of a web platform for rehabilitation is an eminent case for an explorative action learning study. The empirical material is compiled through participant observation, analysis of written sources, and interviews. The theory of wicked problems is used as an analytical lens. Findings: New challenges emerged throughout the project period. Negotiations related to trade-offs between clinical and IT capabilities, decision-making on project goals, resource allocations, priority setting between re-design or new design, and compatibility with other IT solutions for healthcare. Participants were creative, flexible, conservators of professional standards, and appreciated mono- and cross-professional work divisions. When stakeholders were brought together across technology and healthcare settings, suggestions about what was needed to be fit-for-purpose-design and to secure user satisfaction were abundant. Leaders play a key role in these processes. Conclusion and recommendations: Good intentions and collaborative efforts must be supported by systems thinking, management involvement, and critical appreciation of the conditions for collaboration, commercial value, and clinical value. Systems thinking and adaptive strategies relieve front-line workers (healthcare and IT teams) from the responsibility of commercial and end-user success, facilitate creativity, and contribute to new solutions and perseverance in design processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.