ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring the relationship between audio-visual perception in Fuzhou universities and college students' attention restoration quality using machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the Nexus between campus green spaces and mental well-being in mainland China and Hong Kong.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In response to the challenges posed by mental health issues among college students and the declining quality of campus environments, this study aims to reveal the complex mechanisms underlying the relationship between campus audiovisual environments and the quality of students' attention recovery. It further explores campus landscape optimization pathways driven by multi-source data, providing scientific basis for sustainable campus planning. Methods: Taking Fuzhou University Town as a case study, this study integrates machine learning technology with multi-source data (street view images, social media text, and PRS-11 questionnaires) to construct a "multi-modal perception mechanism analysis-dynamic evaluation iteration" framework. The CNN-BiLSTM model was used to predict attention recovery quality, combined with HRNet semantic segmentation, GBRT soundscape prediction, and CSV-T4SA sentiment analysis models to quantify audiovisual elements. XGBoost models and SHAP interpretability analysis were employed to reveal the effects and interaction mechanisms of variables. Results: (1) Attention recovery quality is significantly higher in liberal arts and agricultural/forestry universities than in science and engineering universities, with boundary effects and the synergistic design of humanistic soundscapes being key factors; (2) SHAP analysis identifies humanistic soundscapes, natural soundscapes, and color complexity as core influencing factors, with their effects exhibiting significant threshold characteristics; (3) Linear interaction mechanisms among audiovisual elements are discovered, such as the interaction between vegetation density and building enclosure degree enhancing recovery efficacy, and the synergistic design of musical soundscapes and paving materials can optimize perceptual experiences. Conclusion: By innovatively integrating multi-source data and machine learning techniques, this study systematically analyzes the relationship between campus audiovisual environments and attention recovery, breaking through the limitations of traditional linear analysis. The proposed "threshold response design" and "cross-modal collaborative optimization" strategies provide a new paradigm for campus planning, validate the scientific value of multi-sensory interaction design for mental health promotion, and offer a transferable methodological framework for global university environmental upgrades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.