ArticlePattern recognition2026
A graph transformer-based foundation model for brain functional connectivity network.
Article in Pattern recognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although foundation models have advanced many medical imaging fields, their absence in neuroimage analysis limits progress in neuroscience and clinical practice. Brain functional connectivity (FC) analysis is central to understanding brain function and widely used in neuroscience. We propose a foundation model tailored for brain functional connectivity networks (FCN). Our graph transformer model integrates node and edge embeddings to extract FCN features and adapts flexibly to classification, regression, and clustering via task-specific adapters. We validate the model on fMRI data from 10,718 subjects across multiple tasks: gender classification, mental disorder classification (distinguishing schizophrenia or autism from healthy population), brain age prediction, and depressive and anxiety disorder biotyping. Compared to 14 competing methods, our model consistently outperforms them. Moreover, it facilitates biomarker discovery by identifying task-specific FC patterns. In summary, we present a novel, versatile foundation model for FCN that advances neuroimaging research through scalable and interpretable analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.