ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Leveraging AlphaFold2 structural space exploration for generating drug target structures in structure-based virtual screening.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational virtual screening (VS) plays a vital role in early-stage drug discovery by enabling the efficient selection of candidate compounds and reducing associated costs. However, the absence of experimentally determined three-dimensional protein structures often limits the applicability of structure-based VS. Advances in protein structure prediction, notably AlphaFold2, have begun to address this gap. Yet, studies indicate that direct use of AlphaFold2-predicted structures often leads to suboptimal VS performance-likely because these structures fail to capture ligand-induced conformational changes (apo-to-holo transitions). To overcome this, we propose an approach that explores and modifies the structural space of AlphaFold2 predictions to generate conformations more amenable to VS. Our method deliberately alters the multiple sequence alignment (MSA) by introducing alanine mutations at key residues in the ligand-binding site, thereby inducing significant conformational shifts. The exploration process is guided by iterative ligand docking simulations, with mutation strategies optimized either by a genetic algorithm or via random search. Our evaluation shows that when sufficient active compounds are available, the genetic algorithm significantly enhances VS accuracy. In contrast, with limited active compound data, a random search strategy proves more effective. Moreover, our approach is particularly promising for targets that yield poor screening results when using experimentally determined structures from the PDB. Overall, these findings underscore the practical utility of modified AlphaFold2-derived structures in VS and expand the potential of computationally predicted protein models in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.