Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688470›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Positive Impact of Health Check-Ups and Guidance in the General Population: A Database-Based Cohort Study in Japan.

Yukio Shimasaki, Masanori Nojima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukio ShimasakiGraduate School of Frontier Science, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan.
Masanori NojimaGraduate School of Frontier Science, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite ongoing debate, the effectiveness of health check-ups as a general population health approach has not been conclusively determined. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effect of a health check-up program on various health parameters over a long-term period in accordance with a long-standing practice of health check-ups and guidance in Japan. Methods: Data from 3 prefectures in the Kanto region, encompassing individuals receiving health check-ups (aged 40-74 years) between 2008 and 2018, were obtained from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Health outcomes were tracked and analyzed using statistical models, stratifying by stages of behavioral change. The exposures of interest were health guidance (active support and motivational support) and whether or not health check-ups were skipped. Results: The analysis suggests that receiving active or motivational support was associated with reductions in metabolic syndrome indicators among participants with multiple visits ( Conclusions: Study findings suggest that the health guidance in the Japan's specific health check-up programs in a general population is associated with improved health outcomes. Regular engagement also appears to be linked to sustained health benefits, highlighting the importance of strategies to enhance the long-term participation.

Indexed as

Behavioral changehealth check-uphealth guidancehealth insuranceJapanmetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40688470
PMCPMC12275113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.