Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688392›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025

PathVLM-Eval: Evaluation of open vision language models in histopathology.

Nauman Ullah Gilal, Rachida Zegour, Khaled Al-Thelaya, Erdener Özer, Marco Agus, Jens Schneider, Sabri Boughorbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nauman Ullah GilalQatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Rachida ZegourQatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Khaled Al-ThelayaCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Erdener ÖzerSidra Medicine and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Marco AgusCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Jens SchneiderCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Sabri BoughorbelQatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging trend of vision language models (VLMs) has introduced a new paradigm in artificial intelligence (AI). However, their evaluation has predominantly focused on general-purpose datasets, providing a limited understanding of their effectiveness in specialized domains. Medical imaging, particularly digital pathology, could significantly benefit from VLMs for histological interpretation and diagnosis, enabling pathologists to use a complementary tool for faster morecomprehensive reporting and efficient healthcare service. In this work, we are interested in benchmarking VLMs on histopathology image understanding. We present an extensive evaluation of recent VLMs on the PathMMU dataset, a domain-specific benchmark that includes subsets such as PubMed, SocialPath, and EduContent. These datasets feature diverse formats, notably multiple-choice questions (MCQs), designed to aid pathologists in diagnostic reasoning and support professional development initiatives in histopathology. Utilizing VLMEvalKit, a widely used open-source evaluation framework-we bring publicly available pathology datasets under a single evaluation umbrella, ensuring unbiased and contamination-free assessments of model performance. Our study conducts extensive zero-shot evaluations of more than 60 state-of-the-art VLMs, including LLaVA, Qwen-VL, Qwen2-VL, InternVL, Phi3, Llama3, MOLMO, and XComposer series, significantly expanding the range of evaluated models compared to prior literature. Among the tested models, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct achieved superior performance with an average score of 63.97% outperforming other models across all PathMMU subsets. We conclude that this extensive evaluation will serve as a valuable resource, fostering the development of next-generation VLMs for analyzing digital pathology images. Additionally, we have released the complete evaluation results on our leaderboard PathVLM-Eval: https://huggingface.co/spaces/gilalnauman/PathVLMs.

Indexed as

LLMs benchmarkingPathologyVLMsZero-shot evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40688392
PMCPMC12276438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.