ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
PathVLM-Eval: Evaluation of open vision language models in histopathology.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing CNNs and LoRA-Fine-Tuned Vision-Language Models for Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emerging trend of vision language models (VLMs) has introduced a new paradigm in artificial intelligence (AI). However, their evaluation has predominantly focused on general-purpose datasets, providing a limited understanding of their effectiveness in specialized domains. Medical imaging, particularly digital pathology, could significantly benefit from VLMs for histological interpretation and diagnosis, enabling pathologists to use a complementary tool for faster morecomprehensive reporting and efficient healthcare service. In this work, we are interested in benchmarking VLMs on histopathology image understanding. We present an extensive evaluation of recent VLMs on the PathMMU dataset, a domain-specific benchmark that includes subsets such as PubMed, SocialPath, and EduContent. These datasets feature diverse formats, notably multiple-choice questions (MCQs), designed to aid pathologists in diagnostic reasoning and support professional development initiatives in histopathology. Utilizing VLMEvalKit, a widely used open-source evaluation framework-we bring publicly available pathology datasets under a single evaluation umbrella, ensuring unbiased and contamination-free assessments of model performance. Our study conducts extensive zero-shot evaluations of more than 60 state-of-the-art VLMs, including LLaVA, Qwen-VL, Qwen2-VL, InternVL, Phi3, Llama3, MOLMO, and XComposer series, significantly expanding the range of evaluated models compared to prior literature. Among the tested models, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct achieved superior performance with an average score of 63.97% outperforming other models across all PathMMU subsets. We conclude that this extensive evaluation will serve as a valuable resource, fostering the development of next-generation VLMs for analyzing digital pathology images. Additionally, we have released the complete evaluation results on our leaderboard PathVLM-Eval: https://huggingface.co/spaces/gilalnauman/PathVLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.