ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Neurophysiological predictors of deep learning based unilateral upper limb motor imagery classification.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a technique for decoding and classifying the intention of motor execution, solely based on imagined (rather than executed) movements. Although deep learning techniques have increased the potential of BCIs, the complexity of decoding unilateral upper limb motor imagery remains challenging. To understand whether neurophysiological features, which are directly related to neural mechanisms of motor imagery, might influence classification accuracy, most studies have largely leveraged traditional machine learning frameworks, leaving deep learning-based techniques underexplored. Methods: In this work, three different deep learning models from the literature (EEGNet, FBCNet, NFEEG) and two common spatial pattern-based machine learning classifiers (SVM, LDA) were used to classify imagined right elbow flexion and extension from participants using electroencephalography data. From two recorded resting states (eyes-open, eyes-closed), absolute and relative alpha and beta power of the frontal, fronto-central and central electrodes were used to predict the accuracy of the different classifiers. Results: The prediction of classifier accuracies by neurophysiological features revealed negative correlations between the relative alpha band and classifier accuracies and positive correlations between the absolute and relative beta band and classifiers accuracies. Most ipsilateral EEG channels yielded significant correlations with classifier accuracies, especially for the machine learning classifier. Discussion: This pattern contrasts with previous findings from bilateral MI paradigms, where contralateral alpha and beta activity were more influential. These inverted correlations suggest task-specific neurophysiological mechanisms in unilateral MI, emphasizing the role of ipsilateral inhibition and attentional processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.