Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688346›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025

Differential Distributions: A refined methodology to indirect reference interval estimation by including Patient's health status according to associated ICD-10 codes.

David Schär, Tobias U Blatter, Harald Witte, Jivko Stoyanov, Martin Hersberger, Christos T Nakas, Alexander B Leichtle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David SchärUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry Inselspital - Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Tobias U BlatterUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry Inselspital - Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Harald WitteUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry Inselspital - Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Jivko StoyanovSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Martin HersbergerDivision of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christos T NakasUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry Inselspital - Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander B LeichtleCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (CAIM) University of Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional methods for estimating reference intervals (RIs) using patient's blood test results from the clinical routine, typically remove outliers without considering the nuanced health statuses of patients. This removes a vast majority of test results for reference interval estimation without considering the actual health status of the patient. Methods: We introduce the Differential Distribution Method (DDM) which uses laboratory routine data coded with ICD-10 to approximate an underlying non-diseased age and sex stratified population from mixed clinical data. By removing test results that stem from subpopulations significantly different from the general population, reference intervals can be generated stratified by sex and age, taking into account the associated health conditions of the patients as derived by the ICD-10 coding system. Results: Applying the DDM to blood plasma potassium levels demonstrated its ability to adjust RIs dynamically across different patient groups. The method effectively differentiated RIs in a decade-based stratification, showing significant variability and tighter confidence intervals, particularly in older (above 60 years old) adults. The RIs were slightly wider with advancing age in both males and females, while their standard deviation was reduced by removing large portions of test results differing significantly, grouped by either their individual ICD-10 code or clusters of ICD-10 codes. Conclusions: This DDM data mining approach offers a robust framework for RI inference by generating adjusted RIs that incorporate clinical nuances reflected in ICD-10 codes. This approach not only enhances the accuracy of patient diagnostics but also facilitates the identification of potential multimorbidities affecting laboratory results.

Indexed as

Clinical diagnosticsLaboratory MedicineMachine LearningPersonalized MedicineReference intervals

Identifiers

PMID40688346
PMCPMC12275890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.