ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Predictive factors for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneous efficacy and predictors of response to immunotherapy in driver-mutant advanced NSCLC: a focus on EGFR and KRAS subtypes.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a predictive model for prognosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional development and validation of habitat imaging for predicting outcomes of first-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Randomized clinical studies have demonstrated that programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can provide significant survival benefit to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of inhibitors is complex, necessitating a comprehensive summary of their efficacy and adverse effects. Our study is specifically designed to reach this objective. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with locally advanced or stage IV NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with other antitumor drugs at a single center. Results: Among 123 patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were 24.0 weeks, 42.3%, and 66.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2-3, irAEs occurrence, tumor cell proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, and non-Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) driver gene alterations as factors significantly associated with PFS. Landmark analysis was conducted to minimize immortal time bias and revealed the association of irAEs with efficacy. Of the patients, 39.8% experienced irAEs, with skin-related irAEs being the most common (22.0%), followed by thyroid dysfunction (13.0%) and pneumonia (12.2%). Approximately 16.3% of patients temporarily or permanently discontinued immunotherapy due to irAEs. No deaths were attributed to irAEs. Conclusions: Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC were generally consistent with results from randomized clinical trials. ECOG PS 2-3, non-KRAS driver gene alterations, TPS ≥50%, and irAEs were found to be significantly associated with PFS. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that the occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better efficacy of immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.