ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Causality of genetically determined gut microbiota on lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal relationship between circadian rhythm-related genes expression and spinal disorders: systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization analysis and virtual screening.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Role of Gut Microbiome in Oncogenesis and Oncotherapies.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is a growing global health concern, characterized by a persistent static 5-year survival rate and a worrisome increase in LC-related deaths. Despite substantial research, the connection between gut microbiota and LC remains a topic of ongoing debate. Conventional observational studies are susceptible to potential confounders and inverse causation. This study aims to investigate the potential causal association between gut microbiota and LC by using Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods: There were 5,717,754 gut microbiota-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified from the MiBioGen consortium (18,340 participants from 24 cohorts) used as instrumental variables in our study. Gut microbiota composition was measured using 16S rRNA sequencing, and association estimates for 211 bacterial taxa were obtained after adjusting for age, gender, technical variables, and genetic principal components. Genetic statistics related to LC were obtained from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) database, involving 11,348 cases and 15,861 controls. LC cases were diagnosed based on histopathological confirmation, which is the gold standard for LC diagnosis. The inverse variance-weighted method was applied to estimate the causation between gut microbiota composition and LC. Colocalization analysis was also performed within a 500 kb window of identified SNPs, with posterior probability (PP)4/(PP3 + PP4) >0.8 confirming colocalization signals. Results: There were 27,209 eligible studies involving 11,348 patients included. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) analysis revealed significant associations for one taxonomic order, two families, and seven genera within the gut microbiota composition. Specifically, we observed significant associations with order Bifidobacteriales [odds ratio (OR) =0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.97, P=0.03], family Bifidobacteriaceae (OR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97, P=0.03), family Peptococcaceae (OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, P=0.02), genus Conclusions: These findings suggest that targeting gut microbiota-associated pathways, such as short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, may offer novel strategies for LC prevention and treatment. Future research should explore the clinical implications of modulating gut microbiota to improve LC outcomes, particularly in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.