ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
The association of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index with postoperative complications in patients undergoing lung resection for bronchiectasis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable prognostic model for early unfavorable outcomes after bronchiectasis surgery.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) as an Independent Predictor for Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Risks.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with bronchiectasis often experience systemic inflammation and malnutrition, which adversely affect their prognosis. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has recently emerged as a novel biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation and nutritional status. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of ALI for postoperative complications in patients with bronchiectasis undergoing localized surgical resection. Methods: This retrospective study included 191 patients with localized bronchiectasis treated at our center between January 2013 and November 2023. The optimal cutoff value for ALI was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative complications. A nomogram was constructed based on the independent risk factors. The predictive performance of the nomogram model was evaluated using calibration curve, and its accuracy was assessed via the ROC curve. Results: The optimal ALI cutoff value was 43.1. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that ALI [odds ratio (OR): 3.006; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.351-6.686; P=0.007], low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.868; 95% CI: 0.760-0.992; P=0.04), and operation time (OR: 1.010; 95% CI: 1.002-1.018; P=0.02) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. A nomogram incorporating these factors was developed, showing good predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.776. Conclusions: Preoperative ALI is an independent predictor of postoperative complications in patients with localized bronchiectasis. The predictive model based on ALI provides clinicians with a valuable tool for assessing the risk of postoperative complications in bronchiectasis patients undergoing surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.