Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688294›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Clinical and surgical outcome following chest wall reconstruction using a novel rigid prosthesis-a single-center experience.

Meret Appel, Maurice Pradella, Zeljko Djakovic, Didier Lardinois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meret AppelDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel and University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-0622
Maurice PradellaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel and University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-7835
Zeljko DjakovicDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel and University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-7519
Didier LardinoisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel and University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8285-8360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For various reasons, a chest wall resection may be necessary. Large defects in the chest wall and sternum require reconstruction to avoid paradoxical, inadequate breathing, protect underlying structures, and achieve a good functional result. Codubix Methods: We postoperatively collected data from eleven patients (mean age 53 years) who underwent chest wall reconstruction with Codubix Results: Indications for resection were tumors (n=9) and osteomyelitis (n=2) in anterior (n=2), anterolateral (n=7), lateral (n=1), and posterolateral (n=1) locations. The sternum was involved in three patients. Complications included one patient with dislocation due to an initially undersized prosthesis, which was followed by an uneventful reoperation. Functional assessment was performed on nine patients at a median follow-up time of 11 (5.75, 49.5) months. The mean NRS pain score was 1.7±2.2, and the median QuickDASH score was of 6.8. The chest wall was stable in all patients. Dynamic MRI showed symmetric chest wall movement in all but two patients, without observation of paradoxical motion. Conclusions: We observed excellent functional results using Codubix

Indexed as

chest wall reconstructionChest wall resectionclinical outcomeCodubix®Ribsstability

Identifiers

PMID40688294
PMCPMC12268386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.