ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Clinical and surgical outcome following chest wall reconstruction using a novel rigid prosthesis-a single-center experience.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Use of CODUBIXJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For various reasons, a chest wall resection may be necessary. Large defects in the chest wall and sternum require reconstruction to avoid paradoxical, inadequate breathing, protect underlying structures, and achieve a good functional result. Codubix Methods: We postoperatively collected data from eleven patients (mean age 53 years) who underwent chest wall reconstruction with Codubix Results: Indications for resection were tumors (n=9) and osteomyelitis (n=2) in anterior (n=2), anterolateral (n=7), lateral (n=1), and posterolateral (n=1) locations. The sternum was involved in three patients. Complications included one patient with dislocation due to an initially undersized prosthesis, which was followed by an uneventful reoperation. Functional assessment was performed on nine patients at a median follow-up time of 11 (5.75, 49.5) months. The mean NRS pain score was 1.7±2.2, and the median QuickDASH score was of 6.8. The chest wall was stable in all patients. Dynamic MRI showed symmetric chest wall movement in all but two patients, without observation of paradoxical motion. Conclusions: We observed excellent functional results using Codubix
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.