ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Assessment of efficacy, safety and survival of tislelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world data study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tislelizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has made significant advancements in the neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable ESCC remain uncertain. This study aims to provide robust and precise evidence for the clinical application of tislelizumab in neoadjuvant therapy for ESCC by analyzing real-world data. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced patients (stage IIA-IVA) with pathologically confirmed ESCC who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from August 2022 to April 2024. Following evaluations by thoracic surgeons and oncologists, these patients received neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgical resection. The primary endpoints were the pCR rate and the safety assessment of neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary endpoints included the R0 resection rate, tumor regression grade, objective response rate (ORR), postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled, with a pCR rate of 22%. During the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) period, the most common adverse events (AEs) included anemia (56%). The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 10%. The R0 resection rate was 100%, and the most common postoperative complications included pulmonary infection (13/50, 26%). The 1-year OS rate was 93.9%, while the 1-year DFS rate was 73.5%. Conclusions: In real-world data, tislelizumab as a neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced ESCC patients demonstrated excellent safety and feasibility. However, further investigation is needed to assess its long-term survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.