ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Long-term oncologic benefit of postoperative chemotherapy in the resected ampulla of Vater cancer: hope or hype? A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The oncologic benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected ampulla of Vater cancer (AoVCa) remain contentious. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic effects of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PACT) in patients who underwent radical surgery for AoVCa. Methods: From 2005 to 2019, clinical and pathological data of 306 AoVCa patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the PACT (+) and PACT (-) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for clinical factors. Results: The PACT (+) group (n = 124) and PACT (-) group (n = 182) showed significant differences in cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and cancer differentiation. Lower overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) were observed in the PACT (+) group. After PSM, no significant differences in OS or DFS were found between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis and perineural invasion as significant prognostic factors, while PACT did not significantly impact long-term survival. Paradoxically, PACT was associated with worse outcomes in patients with favorable prognostic factors. Conclusion: This study suggests that PACT does not provide a clear oncologic benefit for resected AoVCa patients and may even be detrimental for those with favorable prognostic factors. There is an urgent need to develop effective anticancer treatments and consider tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual patient profiles. Future research should focus on long-term follow-up and the integration of precision medicine to improve outcomes for AoVCa patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.