ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Leveraging augmented reality for dynamic guidance in 3-dimensional laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery: a prospective case series study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Seeing the invisible: Three-dimensional liver modeling from simulation to the scalpel.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Review
- Toward augmented reality in laparoscopic liver surgery using electromagnetic tracking: a clinical feasibility study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Augmented intelligence in "robotic" liver surgery: Integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for real-time navigation and margin precision.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Review
- [Minimally invasive liver resection-New techniques].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Visualization-driven digital technologies in oncology: current applications, technological advances, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate anatomical knowledge and precise visualization are critical during liver surgery. We developed augmented reality (AR) software that overlays digital 3-dimensional (3D) models onto laparoscopic or robotic views, providing real-time visual aids for surgical navigation during 3D laparoscopic and robotic liver surgeries. This study assesses the accuracy of manual registration and the subjective perception of this AR software by the operator. Methods: Ten consecutive patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic or robotic liver surgery from December 2023 to February 2024 were selected for application of the AR software during surgery. Manual registration accuracy was quantified post-registration using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to compare the stereoscopic and virtual liver images. A 6-question operator survey, using a 5-point Likert scale, was administered after each surgery to evaluate the software's helpfulness in clinical settings. Results: Seven males and 3 females (mean age, 62.4 ± 6.4 years) underwent liver surgery (3D laparoscopic, 5; robotic, 5). Surgical procedures included 4 right hemihepatectomies, 1 extended left hemihepatectomy, 1 left lateral sectionectomy, and 4 segmentectomies. The mean tumor size was 4.4 ± 2.2 cm (range, 1.0-7.5 cm). The mean DSC was 0.912 ± 0.052 (range, 0.879-0.954). The operator rated registration alignment favorably before (mean score, 3.9 ± 1.1) and after mobilization (mean score, 4.1 ± 1.2). The software was reported as very helpful overall (mean score, 4.2 ± 0.8), and in locating blood vessels (4.2 ± 0.6) and tumors (4.3 ± 0.7). Conclusion: Clinical application of the AR software during 3D laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery is feasible, with favorable registration accuracy and high operator perception of helpfulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.