ReviewResuscitation plus2025
Effects of head-up CPR on survival and neurological outcomes: A systematic review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact on survival and neurological outcomes of head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine whether head-up CPR or head-up CPR bundle affects survival and neurological outcomes. Methods: In this review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024541714), we searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Emcare and Cochrane library from inception to February 12, 2025. The inclusion criteria were studies: in adults and children in any setting (in-hospital or out-of-hospital) with cardiac arrest, comparing head-up CPR or head-up CPR bundle with standard or compression-only CPR in supine position, and randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies. We excluded non-human studies and used Cochrane's Risk of Bias-2 and ROBINS-I tools for risk of bias assessment, and GRADE for outcome assessment. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the findings. Results: We identified four observational studies with 10,099 participants and no RCTs. All outcomes were judged to be very-low certainty of evidence, subject to high-risk of bias. Two pre- and post-intervention studies showed no statistically significant difference in survival with a good neurological outcome. The other two studies, which analyzed overlapping cohorts comparing the head-up CPR bundle with conventional CPR, showed mixed results-one found no statistically significant difference in survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological status, while the other, focusing on patients with nonshockable rhythms, found that the head-up CPR bundle was associated with increased survival with favorable neurological function. Conclusions: The available evidence remains limited, highlighted by the absence of RCTs or observational studies with adequate comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.