ReviewCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Bacteriophages as an alternative strategy for the treatment of drug resistant bacterial infections: Current approaches and future perspectives.
Review in Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic heterogeneity and genetic mechanisms of phage resistance in hypervirulent carbapenem-resistantVirulence · 2026Article
- Genomic characterization and therapeutic potential of five broad-spectrum lytic bacteriophages against multidrug-resistant avian pathogenicMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Pathological networks and multi-target interventions in sepsis-associated acute lung injury: from pathogen-host interactions to gut-lung axis regulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Lytic bacteriophages targeting carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in a resource-limited Zambian laboratory.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Bioinformatic Identification of CRISPR-Cas Systems inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A persistent increase in antimicrobial resistance presents a significant danger to global public health. The application of bactericidal phages that do not interfere with the body's natural flora becomes a promising approach to alternative treatments. This section offers an in-depth examination of the use of bacteriophage therapy in both laboratory and human trials for the treatment of specific bacterial infections. The benefits and hurdles of increasing the use of bacteriophages as a supplemental or alternative treatment for bacterial infections resistant to antibiotics are examined. The use of highly adaptable bacteriophage populations, combined with antibiotic chemical compounds, as molecular tools to combat rapidly evolving pathogenic bacteria in the host environment, presents significant virologic complexities. Pre-clinical studies, isolated clinical reports and a few randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that bacteriophages can be effective for treating bacterial infections that are resistant to multiple drugs. The capability of certain bacteriophages to reverse antibiotic resistance, as well as resistance to human complement and other bacteriophages seems to be a significant benefit of bacteriophage therapy, despite the predictable appearance of bacteriophage-resistant strains. Bacteriophages or specific products derived from them can improve antimicrobial effectiveness by decreasing bacteria's harmful properties through changes to fundamental bacterial structures, mainly their cell walls and membranes. Despite several ongoing issues regarding their practical use, it seems that bacteriophage-based treatments combined with antibiotics can serve as an effective solution to addressing the spread of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.