ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting co-infection of
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based radiomics nomogram for distinguishingTranslational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven risk assessment of severeFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for diagnosing severeFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Early prediction of plastic bronchitis in pediatric patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factor analysis of children with severeTranslational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalized pediatric pneumonia patients from June to December 2023 at Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans were performed using a multi-slice CT scanner with over 64 detectors. Fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect 14 pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. The most recent laboratory results prior to BAL were included in multifactorial logistic regression (LR) analysis, selecting variables with P<0.05 for constructing the clinical model. The largest cross-section of the lesion was selected, and image segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP software. Radiomics features were extracted with Pyradomics. Features were filtered using t-tests, Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 124 cases of MPP and children with Co-MPP were included. The extracted radiomics features consisted of first-order signal intensity features (n=360), morphological features (n=14), and texture features (n=1,460). LASSO regression and ten-fold cross-validation identified 23 non-zero correlation coefficient features for constructing Radscore. The LR model demonstrated superior predictive performance for Co-MPP in the validation cohort, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951, sensitivity of 0.778, and specificity of 0.875. The nomogram model combining clinical and radiomics labels significantly outperformed the clinical model (P=0.004). Calibration curve analysis indicated that the nomogram model exhibited the best agreement with actual values. Both the radiomics and nomogram models provided greater clinical net benefits compared to the clinical model. Conclusions: The radiomics model trained using machine learning effectively predicts Co-MPP in children, while the combined clinical and radiomics nomogram model offers the best predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.