ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Effect of different subtalar joint arthroereisis implants on pediatric flexible flatfoot: a finite element analysis.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis in pediatric flatfoot with or without spring ligament repair.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flexible flat foot is a relatively common disease treated by foot and ankle surgery, and subtalar arthroereisis (STA) has gradually become favored by foot and ankle surgeons due to its advantages. However, which sinus tarsi implant is optimal remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical outcomes of two types sinus tarsi implants of different sizes via finite element analysis. Methods: A finite element model of pediatric flexible flatfoot deformity was established in which virtual surgery of STA was simulated. Boundary and loading conditions were assumed from the data of previous finite element analysis study. The corrective ability in talar-first metatarsal angle, talonavicular coverage angle, calcaneus pitch angle, and arch height were compared and analyzed. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, the peak von Mises of medial and lateral columns, and strain of the medial ligaments were also compared and analyzed. Results: All the indexes were changed after the placement of the STA implants. The plantar pressure and the load of medial/lateral columns were redistributed, while the strain of the ligaments was also decreased to differing degrees. When the implants of HyProCure and Talar-Fit inserted, the parameters involved were significantly changed. Moreover, the parameters involved were changed obviously in the larger sizes of implant. Conclusions: Both types of implants are beneficial in the treatment of pediatric flexible flatfoot deformity; however, HyProCure exhibited a stronger effect than did Talar-Fit. For both HyProCure and Talar-Fit, the larger sizes were better than the smaller ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.