ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Validation and application of the breast cancer distress thermometer in Chinese patients: Cutoff scores and stage-specific manifestations.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern Personalized Strategies for Breast Cancer Treatment: Bridging Precision Oncology and Psycho-Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Financial toxicity and its association with quality of life and psychological distress among patients with gynecologic cancers receiving radiotherapy in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychological distress and its influencing factors in esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The first aim was to update and revise the Distress Thermometer (DT) to enhance its applicability in breast cancer patients. The second aim was to define the cutoff scores of the Breast Cancer Distress Thermometer (DT-BC) and identify the prevalence and manifestations of distress across different stages of the disease. Methods: The DT-BC was updated according to the Distress Management Guidelines from NCCN, Version 3.2019, and revised through a literature review, expert consultation, and patient surveys. Reliability was assessed using reliability analysis, test-retest reliability, and Kappa value; validity was tested via content and criterion-related validity. The cutoff scores of DT-BC were determined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the area under the curve (AUC). Nonparametric tests and logistic regression were used to analyze distress manifestations. Results: The total Cronbach's α for the problem list was 0.805, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.750, with a Kappa value of 0.458. The content validity index was 1.00, and the criterion-related validity coefficient was 0.476. The DT-BC cutoff score was 6 for the diagnostic and postoperative treatment stages, 5 for the neoadjuvant and postoperative stages, and 4 for the rehabilitation stage. The prevalence and manifestations of distress varied significantly across different stages, with emotional distress being a common manifestation throughout the disease process. Conclusions: Based on the results of this psychometric evaluation, the DT-BC is considered suitable for use in the routine psychological screening of breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.