Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688098›Full record

ArticleHealth care transitions2025

Reflections on youth partnership in a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to optimize transition from pediatric to adult care in inflammatory bowel disease.

Brooke Allemang, Ashleigh Miatello, Pranshu Maini, Joshua Eszczuk, Claudia Tersigni, Samantha Micsinszki, Sneha Dave, Natasha Bollegala, Nancy Fu, Kate Lee and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care transitions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brooke AllemangChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ashleigh MiatelloChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Pranshu MainiChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Joshua EszczukFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Claudia TersigniSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Samantha MicsinszkiSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sneha DaveGeneration Patient, United States.
Natasha BollegalaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Nancy FuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kate LeeCrohn's and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Samantha J AnthonyChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Melanie BarwickChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Eric I BenchimolChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement allows for developing health interventions and research studies that align with the needs of people living with chronic diseases. Actively involving people with lived experience as partners in the design and governance of interventional trials is gaining prominence. However, there is a dearth of literature exploring the processes and procedures of patient partnership in various stages of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), specifically. Methods: This reflective viewpoint outlines how AYA patient partners were involved in a RCT of an intervention to optimize transition from pediatric to adult care in IBD through a Youth Advisory Panel. To achieve this objective, we: i) gathered information from eight members of the study team via virtual discussions, ii) reflected on our experiences collaborating with patient partners in the RCT, and iii) reviewed relevant documents, including meeting minutes. Discussion transcripts, reflections, and documents were reviewed by two academic researchers and one AYA patient partner to identify the varying levels of involvement among AYA patient partners in the trial. The engagement strategies implemented to maximize the translational impact of the multimodal intervention and inform patient-centered care across various stages of the RCT were also examined. Results: The processes, outputs and impacts of AYAs' contributions in priority setting and planning, intervention design and refinement, study execution, dissemination, and post-trial intervention implementation and dissemination were identified. AYA patient partner motivations for involvement in the RCT and key learnings from this partnership were uncovered. Conclusion: AYA patient partners' contributions to the RCT were impactful, from study conceptualization to dissemination. Their involvement ensured the intervention's relevance, usability, and youth-friendliness, informed data analysis, and enhanced knowledge translation through co-creation. Future work in this field could involve evaluating the impact of patient engagement on AYA patient partners, research teams, and research outcomes in RCTs.

Indexed as

AdolescentsInflammatory bowel diseasePatient engagementPatient-oriented researchTransition to adult careYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40688098
PMCPMC12272582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.