ArticleBioactive materials2025
Extruded nanovesicles derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells exhibit No tumorigenic potential.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Recent Advances on Extracellular Vesicles: A Natural Nanomaterial for Biomedical Application.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Platelet-rich plasma-primed bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes inhibit neuronal apoptosis and autophagy, and promote nerve regeneration via the miR-29a-3p/PTEN/PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis after spinal cord injury.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate liver transplantation-induced ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing hepatocellular complement C5 expression.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- The role of mesenchymal stem cells in IgA nephropathy: current evidence and future directions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Optimal strategies for umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in acute kidney injury: a network meta-analysis in rat models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC EVs) have gained significant attention in biomedical and therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, their translation in clinical practice remains limited due to the lack of scalable manufacturing techniques and the prevailing safety concerns. Cell-derived extruded nanovesicles (eNVs) with high production efficiency are regarded as promising substitutes of EVs. However, like MSC EVs, their potential for tumorigenicity has yet to be exhaustively investigated. In this work, we investigated the tumorigenicity of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived eNVs (UMSC eNVs). A549 cancer cell-derived eNVs (A549 eNVs) with potential tumorigenicity were also prepared for comparative analysis. Our characterization findings revealed that, although UMSC eNVs and A549 eNVs exhibited similar morphologies, they differed in their molecular composition. Subsequent animal experiments demonstrated the low tumorigenicity risk of UMSC eNVs in inducing tumor pathogenesis and development. Furthermore, microRNAs (miRNAs) profiling analyses suggested that the reduced tumorigenicity of UMSC eNVs might be due to the downregulation of hsa-miR-21-5p_R+1 and hsa-miR-192-5p, and upregulation of hsa-miR-143-3p and hsa-miR-146a-5p compared to A549 eNVs. The present study provided direct experimental confirmation and underlying miRNA profiling evidence of the biosafety of UMSC eNVs in terms of tumorigenicity, which will promote the future advancement and translation of UMSC eNVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.