ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2025
Evaluation of the success rate of the semi-sitting position compared with the supine position in the emergency intubation of traumatic patients.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTracheal intubation (TI) is an essential skill for various healthcare providers, including emergency medicine specialists and anesthesiologists. The ramped position has been hypothesized to facilitate TI. In this study, we assessed the success rate of the semi-sitting position compared with the supine position in emergency intubation.
methodsIn this double-blind clinical trial, 162 traumatic patients admitted to the emergency department at Al-Zahra Hospital were randomly assigned to three groups. Patients in Group I underwent TI in the supine position. Patients in Group II underwent TI in a semi-sitting position at a 25-degree angle, while Group III underwent TI in a semi-sitting position at a 35-degree angle. The Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade and the number of intubation attempts were compared among the groups.
resultsOur findings showed a significant reduction in the number of intubation attempts in Groups II and III compared to Group I (P < 0.001). However, the semi-sitting positions (Groups II and III) were associated with a higher incidence of Grade III and IV C-L views, indicating poorer glottic visualization (P < 0.01).
conclusionsThe semi-sitting (ramped) position improves the success rate of TI by reducing the number of intubation attempts. However, it significantly worsens glottic visualization, which may pose challenges during airway management. Further studies are needed to optimize patient positioning in emergency intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.