ArticleBioactive materials2025
Nanostructured GelMA colloidal gels as bioinks for freeform multi-mode 3D printing: better replacement for the classical GelMA polymeric inks.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanically preconditioned stem cells therapy using bioinspired liver-mimetic microspheres for functional liver repair.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A recent review on smart dressings for chronic wound management: from diagnosis to therapy.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Bench-to-Bedside Translation of Self-Healing Colloidal Hydrogels as Next Generation Design of Flowable Hemostatic Matrix: From Preclinical Evaluation to Human Clinical Trials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Construction, evaluation, and applications of renal barrier-on-a-chip system.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Hydrogel Microspheres for Biomedical Applications.Small science · 2026Review
- Brick by Brick the Wall Is Being Built: Particle-Based Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine.Polymers · 2025Review
- Biomaterials-mediated sequential drug delivery: Emerging trends for wound healing.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) hydrogels have been well-recognized as a widely-used natural polymer for biofabrications due to the adaptability for multiple crosslinking schemes, desirable biocompatibility and biodegradability, and ease of chemical functionalization. With regard to 3D bioprinting, however, GelMA has shown unsatisfactory printing stability and accuracy due to slow sol-gel transition, suboptimal mechanical strength, and strict temperature control for printing. We herein developed an innovative dual-crosslinkable colloidal inks composed of self-assembled GelMA nanospheres with 80 % self-healing efficiency, which outperform the traditional GelMA polymeric inks in terms of enhanced printability and fidelity, broader printing temperature range, adjustable mechanical strength ranging from brain analogue 2.83 kPa to cardiac analogue 52.45 kPa, and improved bio-functionalities evidenced by the elevated hydrophilicity, mass transfer efficiency and prolonged drug release profile. Moreover, the granulation design of GelMA inks unlocked freeform 3D printing modes such as direct multi-ink writing, embedded printing, but also allowed in-situ printing directly at the bleeding wound sites due to the outstanding hemostatic efficacy and network stability of colloidal gels. In general, our nanostructured GelMA colloidal inks present a better replacement for the traditional GelMA polymeric inks in 3D bioprinting, which establishes a foundation for bench-to-bedside translations of 3D printing techniques towards more practical clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.