Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688014›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2025

Nanostructured GelMA colloidal gels as bioinks for freeform multi-mode 3D printing: better replacement for the classical GelMA polymeric inks.

Qifan Wang, Kaiwen Chen, Yonggang Zhang, Fei Shao, Xiangyuan Tan, Qiwei Ying, Libin Wang, Changle Ren, Lijun Zhang, Huanan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qifan WangMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Kaiwen ChenMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Yonggang ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Fei ShaoMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Xiangyuan TanMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Qiwei YingMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Libin WangMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.
Changle RenDepartment of Joint Surgery, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, 116044, PR China.
Lijun ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Third People's Hospital of Dalian, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116033, PR China.
Huanan WangMOE Key Laboratory of Bio-Intelligent Manufacturing, Dalian Key Laboratory of Artificial Organ and Regenerative Medicine, School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) hydrogels have been well-recognized as a widely-used natural polymer for biofabrications due to the adaptability for multiple crosslinking schemes, desirable biocompatibility and biodegradability, and ease of chemical functionalization. With regard to 3D bioprinting, however, GelMA has shown unsatisfactory printing stability and accuracy due to slow sol-gel transition, suboptimal mechanical strength, and strict temperature control for printing. We herein developed an innovative dual-crosslinkable colloidal inks composed of self-assembled GelMA nanospheres with 80 % self-healing efficiency, which outperform the traditional GelMA polymeric inks in terms of enhanced printability and fidelity, broader printing temperature range, adjustable mechanical strength ranging from brain analogue 2.83 kPa to cardiac analogue 52.45 kPa, and improved bio-functionalities evidenced by the elevated hydrophilicity, mass transfer efficiency and prolonged drug release profile. Moreover, the granulation design of GelMA inks unlocked freeform 3D printing modes such as direct multi-ink writing, embedded printing, but also allowed in-situ printing directly at the bleeding wound sites due to the outstanding hemostatic efficacy and network stability of colloidal gels. In general, our nanostructured GelMA colloidal inks present a better replacement for the traditional GelMA polymeric inks in 3D bioprinting, which establishes a foundation for bench-to-bedside translations of 3D printing techniques towards more practical clinical applications.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingColloidal gelsDual-crosslinkGelMASelf-healing

Identifiers

PMID40688014
PMCPMC12274887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.