ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
15-year validation of the forgotten joint score after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A reliable indicator of long-term patient satisfaction and joint awareness.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early clinical, radiological, and safety outcomes of NAVIO-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Wiberg patellar morphology on patient-reported outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 3 ~ 5 year retrospective cohort analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers bone- and ligament-preserving treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a modern patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses joint awareness during daily activity-an ideal benchmark for long-term implant success. However, its utility beyond 10 years postoperatively remains insufficiently studied. Purpose: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and validate the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 15 years following medial fixed-bearing UKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 54 patients who underwent medial UKA between 2003 and 2007 at a tertiary academic institution. Functional outcomes (Knee Society Knee Score [KSKS], Knee Society Function Score [KSFS], Oxford Knee Score [OKS], and SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Scores [PCS, MCS]) were assessed preoperatively and at 2, 10, and 15 years postoperatively. At 15 years, patients completed the FJS questionnaire unaided. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), ceiling effects, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression were performed to assess construct validity and patient-perceived outcomes. Multiple linear regression identified preoperative predictors of FJS. Results: Significant and sustained improvements were observed in KSFS, KSKS, OKS, and PCS up to 15 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean FJS at 15 years was 78.6 (SD 23.1); 94.4 % of patients exceeded the PASS threshold, and 50 % achieved "forgotten joint" status (FJS ≥84.38). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.88). FJS showed strong correlations with OKS (r = 0.675, p < 0.001), KSFS (r = 0.470), and PCS (r = 0.340). Logistic regression confirmed FJS as a strong predictor of patient satisfaction (classification accuracy 90.7-92.6 %, p < 0.01). Preoperative KSFS was the only significant predictor of long-term FJS (β = 0.6, p = 0.029). Conclusion: The Forgotten Joint Score is a reliable, internally consistent, and valid long-term outcome measure following medial UKA. Its strong associations with functional scores, patient satisfaction, and preoperative function support its incorporation into long-term clinical outcome assessment and highlight UKA's durability and patient acceptability at 15 years. Level of evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.