Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688001›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025

15-year validation of the forgotten joint score after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A reliable indicator of long-term patient satisfaction and joint awareness.

R Radhakrishnan, S Xu, A X Han, X Liu, M H Liow, H N Pang, D K J Tay, S J Yeo, J Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R RadhakrishnanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
S XuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
A X HanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
X LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
M H LiowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
H N PangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
D K J TayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
S J YeoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
J Y ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers bone- and ligament-preserving treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a modern patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses joint awareness during daily activity-an ideal benchmark for long-term implant success. However, its utility beyond 10 years postoperatively remains insufficiently studied. Purpose: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and validate the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 15 years following medial fixed-bearing UKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 54 patients who underwent medial UKA between 2003 and 2007 at a tertiary academic institution. Functional outcomes (Knee Society Knee Score [KSKS], Knee Society Function Score [KSFS], Oxford Knee Score [OKS], and SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Scores [PCS, MCS]) were assessed preoperatively and at 2, 10, and 15 years postoperatively. At 15 years, patients completed the FJS questionnaire unaided. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), ceiling effects, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression were performed to assess construct validity and patient-perceived outcomes. Multiple linear regression identified preoperative predictors of FJS. Results: Significant and sustained improvements were observed in KSFS, KSKS, OKS, and PCS up to 15 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean FJS at 15 years was 78.6 (SD 23.1); 94.4 % of patients exceeded the PASS threshold, and 50 % achieved "forgotten joint" status (FJS ≥84.38). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.88). FJS showed strong correlations with OKS (r = 0.675, p < 0.001), KSFS (r = 0.470), and PCS (r = 0.340). Logistic regression confirmed FJS as a strong predictor of patient satisfaction (classification accuracy 90.7-92.6 %, p < 0.01). Preoperative KSFS was the only significant predictor of long-term FJS (β = 0.6, p = 0.029). Conclusion: The Forgotten Joint Score is a reliable, internally consistent, and valid long-term outcome measure following medial UKA. Its strong associations with functional scores, patient satisfaction, and preoperative function support its incorporation into long-term clinical outcome assessment and highlight UKA's durability and patient acceptability at 15 years. Level of evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Indexed as

Ceiling effectForgotten joint scoreFunctional recoveryJoint awarenessLong-term outcomesPatient-reported outcome measuresSatisfactionUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40688001
PMCPMC12273487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.