Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687998›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Maternal

Morakot Nuntapaitoon, Piraya Chatthanathon, Matanee Palasuk, Alisa Wilantho, Jakavat Ruampatana, Sissades Tongsima, Sarn Settachaimongkon, Naraporn Somboonna

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Morakot NuntapaitoonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piraya ChatthanathonDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Matanee PalasukDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alisa WilanthoNational Biobank of Thailand, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Jakavat RuampatanaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sissades TongsimaNational Biobank of Thailand, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Sarn SettachaimongkonDepartment of Food Technology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Naraporn SomboonnaMulti-Omics for Functional Products in Food, Cosmetics and Animals Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental objective: Diarrhea is a major cause of piglet mortality, often reported associated with maternal gut bacterial communities (microbiota). Maternal supplementation with probiotic Methods: Sow and litter performances, including milk compositions and incidences of piglet diarrhea, were recorded from farrowing to weaning of control- supplemented vs. probiotic-supplemented sows. Fecal samples from sows classified as before (Cb=17) and after (Ca=17) probiotic supplementation were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and 16S rRNA qPCR, following bioinformatic analyses for alpha-beta diversity, quantitative microbiota, LEfSe (Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size) taxon biomarker analysis, potential microbial metabolism profiles, and statistical correlations with microbial species and clinical data performances. Results: Probiotic-supplemented sows demonstrated the greater average piglets born alive and lower mummified fetuses ( Conclusions: The maternal probiotic

Indexed as

Clostridium butyricumFecesGut microbiomeMetabolomeMicrobiotaMilkSow

Identifiers

PMID40687998
PMCPMC12273217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.