ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Continuous peripheral nerve block in patients with proximal femur fracture: A randomised comparison of three techniques.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fascia iliaca compartment block: A narrative review.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The literature mentions numerous approaches to peripheral nerve blockade for pain management following proximal femur fractures. We aimed to explore the best analgesic option in these patients while comparing blocks of the femoral nerve and fascia iliaca compartment. Methods: Sixty consenting adult trauma patients admitted with proximal femur fractures for surgical fixation under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either sonography-guided continuous fascia iliaca plane block employing suprainguinal (SFICB group) or infrainguinal (IFICB group) approach or femoral nerve block (FNB group) for postoperative analgesia, using 0.2% ropivacaine as initial bolus (volume based on patient's weight), followed by its continuous infusion @10 mL/h for first 24 h. Intravenous morphine was used as a rescue analgesic (RA) to keep a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of <4. Our primary objective included a total number of RA doses administered in the 24-h postoperative period. As secondary outcomes, total RA consumption, analgesia duration, pain scores, quality of pain relief, and adverse effects were noted. Results: The number of RA doses administered was significantly lower in the SIFCB group, with 15% of patients requesting RA boluses in the SFICB group as opposed to 40% and 50% of patients in the IFICB and FNB groups, respectively. Patients in the SFICB group had lower median morphine consumption of 3 mg [interquartile range (IQR): 0-3; range: 0-3.5] in the SFICB group versus 6.5 mg (IQR: 4.1-8.0; range: 3-10.5) and 9.0 mg (IQR: 5.3-14.0; range: 3-14) in the IFICB and FNB groups, respectively ( Conclusion: Following proximal femur fracture surgery, superior pain relief was provided by continuous suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block compared to the infrainguinal approach or simple femoral nerve block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.