ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Perceived learning gaps in paediatric anaesthesia training: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Paediatric anaesthesia requires specialised skills to manage patients effectively, yet training often falls short of clinical needs. To address this, a survey was conducted among anaesthesia trainees and teachers to identify perceived learning gaps. Methods: A self-administered Google questionnaire was used to gather input on teaching and learning paediatric anaesthesia. Faculty and anaesthesia trainees answered 29 questions, organised into multiple sections. Data were analysed using Jeffreys Amazing Statistical Package (JASP) version 0.16.3 Arnhem; Netherlands. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 567 participants, yielding a 25.30% response rate, with 144 participants responding. Exposure to paediatric anaesthesia had a median score of 3 (good). The opportunity for performing tasks was moderate, at 40%-60%, with 47% of respondents primarily assisting rather than performing tasks. Elective placements in paediatric operating theatres were reported by 25% of students in the first 6 months, 38.19% in the second 6 months, and 36.81% during the second year. Tasks were carried out under direct proactive supervision. A positive correlation was found between mask ventilation and intubation skills, with the highest 'r' value (0.714), indicating that more opportunities for mask ventilation increased the chances for intubation. Teaching methods included interactive lectures for knowledge, hands-on practice for skills, and mentoring for the affective domain. Only 19% of respondents were exposed to children under 1 year. Conclusion: The reliance on direct proactive supervision for procedural skill training until the completion of the postgraduate anaesthesia program is concerning. This highlights the need for a curriculum that prioritises skill development, incorporating entrustment goals, suitable teaching methods, and workplace assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.