Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687959›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Evaluation of community-based heat adaptation interventions: a systematic review.

Jai K Das, Bhavita Kumari, Abdu R Rahman, Maha Azhar, Sara Khan, Ujala Masood, Deepna Karan, Rahima Yasin, Christopher Burman, Joseph Luke Augustin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jai K DasInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2966-7162
Bhavita KumariInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-9188
Abdu R RahmanInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maha AzharInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sara KhanUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ujala MasoodInstitute of Business Administration, Karachi, Pakistan.
Deepna KaranBielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Rahima YasinInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Christopher BurmanUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-8339
Joseph Luke AugustinUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0694-4355
Ana BonellCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaInstitute for Global Health Department, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Heat adaptation strategies are crucial to minimising the adverse effects of heat on human health. We systematically reviewed published studies till February 2024 to synthesise and evaluate the evidence of the impact of community-based heat adaptation strategies on surface and indoor temperatures and health outcomes. Methods: Two investigators independently screened relevant databases and extracted data. The review included a total of 141 studies; 124 landscape interventions, out of which 114 focused on green walls/roofs and modified pavements, 21 building modifications including altered construction materials and improved ventilation; and 45 targeted individual-level interventions including heat education and warning systems, heat action plans and modifications in clothing. Meta-analysis was conducted for surface and indoor temperature for each intervention/comparison group for landscape and building modifications, and descriptive analysis was performed on human outcomes for individual-level interventions due to wide variability in reporting of outcomes. Results: The meta-analysis suggests that green roofs significantly reduced surface temperatures by 10.88°C (95% CI: -15.26°C to -6.50°C) and indoor temperatures by 2.4°C (95% CI: -3.54°C to -1.26°C) compared with conventional roofs. Green walls significantly reduced surface temperatures by 2.39°C (95% CI: -4.03°C to -0.74°C) and indoor temperatures by 2.08°C (95% CI: -3.00°C to -1.16°C) compared with bare walls. Pavements with modified asphalt materials reduced surface temperatures by 5.45°C (95% CI: -6.75°C to -4.15°C) compared with conventional asphalt. Reflective paints significantly reduced surface temperature by 4.55°C (95% CI: -6.74°C to -2.36°C) and indoor temperatures by 1.69°C (95% CI: -3.35°C to -0.02°C) compared with conventional roofs. Most studies examining heat action plans reported a decrease in mortality, and heat education and heat warning systems led to reduced morbidity and mortality and improved heat-related knowledge, attitudes and practices. Studies have reported physical strain alleviation and improvement in body temperature while using modified garments. Conclusions: With the increasing exposure to extreme heat, contextual evidence will provide valuable insights for effectiveness, acceptance and cost-effectiveness for various interventions.

Indexed as

Community HealthEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MedicineSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40687959
PMCPMC12273142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.