Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687864›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025

Active Surveillance of Papillary Thyroid Cancer-A Feasibility Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre.

Narmada Nangadda, Hetashvi Gondaliya, Deepali Bhat, Anirudh J Shetty, Kranti S Khadilkar, Shivaprasad Kumbenahalli Siddegowda, Basavaraj G Sooragonda, Vijay Pillai, Vidhya Bhushan Rangappa, Vivek Shetty and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Narmada NangaddaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Hetashvi GondaliyaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Deepali BhatDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Anirudh J ShettyDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Kranti S KhadilkarDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Shivaprasad Kumbenahalli SiddegowdaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Basavaraj G SooragondaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Vijay PillaiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Vidhya Bhushan RangappaDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Vivek ShettyDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Yogesh Madhav DokheDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Trupti C KolurDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Naveen Bangalore ShivanandDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Akhila LakshmikanthaDepartment of Pathology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Vidya RaoDepartment of Pathology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Shaesta Naseem ZaidiDepartment of Pathology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Nisheena RaghavanDepartment of Pathology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Khushboo Mukesh SahetiaDepartment of Pathology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, India.
Subramanian KannanDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bommasandra, 560099 Bangalore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-4821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend active surveillance (AS) as an alternative for very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) based on evidence from observational and cohort studies in Japan and Korea that demonstrated low rates of disease progression. Adopting AS presents unique challenges in India given the need for proper understanding, adequate sonographic expertise, meticulous follow-up and acceptance of the patients and clinicians for active surveillance of diagnosed PTC. We present our data on the feasibility of AS at our centre in the last 7 years. We started adopting AS for patients with PTC or suspected PTC under AS in July 2017. Most of the patients had FNAC category Bethesda V or VI and/or USG category ACR-TIRADS TR4 or TR5 nodules. In all patients, the PTC was discovered incidentally. A baseline CT scan of the neck and chest was performed if indicated and in select patients, serial serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-thyroglobulin (anti-Tg) were done. Patients were followed up semi-annually with neck ultrasound performed by a single operator. We have been following 17 patients with PTC under the AS clinic. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 45.17 (14.7) years with 13 females and a median follow-up of 40 months (IQR 40-46; range 13-86), and none have undergone thyroid surgery. The PTC was discovered incidentally in 12 patients during a neck sonogram for evaluation of painful swallowing or salivary gland-related symptoms and evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism; 2 patients on CT chest for pulmonary symptoms and 3 were "PETomas" during evaluation of their primary cancer (colon cancer, breast cancer and multiple myeloma). Out of the 3 patients who underwent FDG-PET scan, the SUV max of the PTC was 4, 4.8 and 14.6. All except one were uni-focal PTC with size (largest dimension on USG) ranging from 4.8 to 21 mm and median volume 0.21 mL (IQR 0.21-0.37 mL). The baseline median Tg levels were 12.95 ng/mL (range is 0.07 to 51 ng/mL), and anti-Tg was elevated in 4 patients (132 IU/mL, 156 IU/mL, 696 IU/mL, 4000 IU/mL). Serial Tg and anti Tg levels were measured over time in 4 patients. The patient with the largest PTC (21 mm) who is currently under AS had Eisenmenger syndrome. The longest duration of follow-up in the AS cohort is 86 months. One patient conceived and had a healthy baby during active surveillance with no significant increase in the size of the tumour. On follow-up, the volume change in the nodules ranged from - 44 to 335% with 35% (6/17) showing decrement and 65% (11/17) showing increment. The change in the largest dimension ranged from - 28 to 154% with a decrement of 41% (7/17) and increment of 59% (10/17). However, a significant increase in the volume (> 50%) was noted only in 2 patients, and a significant increase in tumour dimension (> 3 mm) was documented in only 2 patients on follow-up. None of the patients has developed regional or distant metastasis, and none has undergone surgery. Our study provides insights into the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with incidentally diagnosed PTC undergoing active surveillance. Our findings support the feasibility and safety of this approach in select individuals, with emphasis on meticulous periodic neck sonography by a single operator, and a like-minded supportive thyroid cancer team.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceNeck ultrasoundPapillary thyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID40687864
PMCPMC12267779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.